Gummy bear implants feel the softest and most natural.
Several women find the texture of their breast implants as significant as their look. If you inquire “which breast implants feel the softest,” essentially, you want a breast implant that has a density and “giving” similar to the natural breast tissue. At Lin Europe Clinic, we are aware that you wish your breasts to move, bounce, and feel like they are the real thing. The development of silicone technology has helped us to use implants with gels that are extremely realistic to the touch and are often called “soft touch” or highly responsive gels.
The softness of an implant primarily depends upon the type of fill material and the cohesivity of the silicone gel inside. Silicone implants aren’t all the same in terms of feel; some are very soft and fluid, others firm and form-stable, etc. When you make your choice, you essentially decide between softness and shape retention. We walk you through these technical details during your consultation so that you can pick a material that fits well with your way of life and aesthetics. The present material also illustrates the basic scientific principles behind the texture of implants.
The Superiority of Silicone Over Saline
According to the softness measure, silicone gel implants are infinitely more superior to saline ones. Saline implants have a silicone shell that is filled with sterile salt water. Safe as it is, water has a very thin consistency that does not compare to natural body fat or breast tissue in terms of viscosity. The fluid sloshing inside can usually be felt, and the implant may be firm or bouncy as a result, like in the case of a water balloon. Saline implants are susceptible to “rippling,” which is when you can feel the edges of the shell through the skin.
Silicone gel implants contain a cohesive gel that very closely mimics the feel of natural fatty tissue. This gel offers your body movement and when touched, gives a soft, pillow-like resistance. Silicone is the standard in the industry for a natural feel. On the strength of this outstanding tactile quality alone, the majority of patients at Lin Europe Clinic select silicone. The difference becomes even more marked with the latest generation of silicones, which are able to provide both durability and softness.
Gel Cohesivity: Soft to Firm
Implants are marketed by manufacturers according to the “cohesivity” level or thickness of the gel used for their manufacture. “Low cohesivity” gels refer to the thinnest and softest types of gels available. These gels feel so much like jelly and have the natural slope and softness that other implants don’t. But since the gel is more fluid, these implants are a bit more at risk of rippling if you have very thin skin. They are suitable if your existing breast tissue is enough to cover the implant edges.
At the opposite extreme are “high cohesivity” implants or form-stable, “gummy bear” implants. These remain firm even when cut in half. They offer excellent lift and projection but compared to low-cohesivity options, they are a little firmer to the touch. Ideally, you would decide whether you like a certain shape (firmness) or a natural slump (softness). Most contemporary manufacturers feature “mid-range” cohesivity, a compromise between structural integrity and a soft, natural feel.
Does the Implant Location Affect the Feel?
The choice of flesh where your surgeon inserts the implant determines the degree of softness in the end result. Implants placed “subglandularly” (over the muscle but under the breast tissue) depend completely on your natural tissue for coverage. If your breast tissue is thick, this placement may feel quite soft. On the other hand, a thin person might see the implant as being located just beneath the skin and therefore feel that it looks artificial.
In most cases, the submuscular placement of the implant provides the softest feeling result for the majority of women. The pectoralis muscle is an additional cushion that goes over the implant. This extra layer helps to hide the implant shell more effectively, and it creates a gentle curve between the chest wall and the breast.
Smooth vs. Textured: Does It Affect the Feeling?
Whether the surface of the implant is smooth or textured makes a small but still perceptible difference to how the breast feels. Compared to textured ones, smooth implants have a thinner shell. The slight softness respirations between the gel and your skin are enabled by this thinness. The implant moves more freely within the breast pocket, mimicking the natural sway of a breast.
A textured implant is one with a thicker shell that can be necessary to allow the implant to “grip” the tissue and not rotate. They are essential for anatomical (teardrop) shapes, but some patients say that they feel slightly stiffer because of the shell thickness. Yet, the variation is very minimal. The internal gel cohesivity still is the biggest contributor to softness. It is up to your surgeon to make you aware of the advantages of a smooth shell against the stability of a textured one.
The Hybrid Option: Fat Transfer to the Breast
It’s great to hear that you want to experience super softness, and indeed one of the ways to achieve this is to combine implants with fat grafting. Here the surgeon first harvests some fat from you via liposuction and then he injects that purified fat around the breast implant. They say the composite breast augmentation technique adds a layer of living tissue over the prosthetic.
Nothing is as soft or as natural as your own fat cells. The layer lets you feel the cushion between the implant edges and your skin, which really enhances the overall softness of the cleavage area. For very thin patients who want to have implants but are afraid that it might be an artificial feeling, it is a perfect solution. The approach combines the volume of an implant with the authenticity of normal tissue.
Breast Implants in Turkey
Turkey is a global aesthetic leader, and it offers the latest implant technology at prices that are much more affordable as compared to those in Europe. At Lin Europe Clinic in Istanbul, we only select implants that are FDA-approved and CE-marked and come from the most renowned manufacturers, such as Mentor and Motiva. These brands are at the forefront of the development of “ergonomic” gels that take the shape and adapt their softness to the body’s movement. You do not have to lower the standard of quality in order to get the best.
The operative approach of Lin Europe Clinic is more than mere surgery; here you get a physical touch and feel experience. A sample implant is always provided for you to touch, squeeze and compare during the consultation. You will be able to feel the difference between cohesive gels and soft touch options before you make a decision. By expert surgical placement combined with premium product selection, we can ensure a result that not only looks good but also feels real. You are welcome to come to Lin Europe Clinic in Turkey and let us help you to gain the confidence of natural-feeling breasts.
Frequently Asked Questions About Soft Breast Implants
If you are looking for breast implants that feel soft to the touch, you should consider silicone gel implants with low cohesivity. This type of implant mimics natural breast tissue better than saline or form-stable implants.
The firmness of gummy bear implants can be attributed to the fact that they maintain their shape more than the traditional silicone. On the other hand, a lot of women view that such firmness is similar to the feeling of perkiness and youthfulness of a natural breast.
Usually, saline implants are known to have a firmer and less natural feel compared to silicone ones. Besides, the fluid moving or rippling inside the shell may be felt.
Fat transfer is a great way to make breast augmentation implants feel much softer. Using your own fat as a layer above the implant is like creating a natural pad.
Of course, breast implants can indeed be softer over time as they “settle” and “fluff and drop”. It is as the skin around relaxes that the implant can be felt as more natural.
Adams, W. P., & Mallucci, P. (2012). Breast Augmentation Video Atlas. Thieme.
Maxwell, G. P., & Gabriel, A. (2014). Bio-dimensional planning in breast augmentation. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 42(4), 505–512.
Spear, S. L., & Jespersen, M. R. (2010). Breast implants: Saline and silicone. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 126(6), 256e-257e.
Stevens, W. G., & Hirsch, E. M. (2008). A comparison of the softness of cohesive gel breast implants. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 28(5), 503-509.
Tebbetts, J. B. (2002). A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 109(4), 1396-1409.
